Network Governance of Migration Profile in Palestine

Author: Saqer Suliman

 

The rapid growth in international migration during the last decades triggers governments to achieve an effective management of migration profile. Countries and international organizations have more interest in migration governance as an optimal method to address migration issues. This study provides an exposition on the network governance of migration profile in Palestine, and the convenient form to be adopted to govern it across the Palestinian institutions working with the issues of migration. This study has used logical analysis and respective criteria to adopt the best form of network governance of migration profile. The degree of trust between network members, the level of goal consensus, and the number of participating organizations are important factors that determines the way in which authority is shared and which form of network governance to adopt. The findings revealed that there is a significant impact of network governance on the level of collaboration between the individual organizations to operate and achieve the common activities. Moreover, the main outcome of this article is that the suitable form of network governance of migration profile in Palestine is that of lead organization; in fact, it is more efficient than shared network governance and it is reasonably flexible than network administrative organization (NAO). The implications of the findings for practice were also highlighted. 

 

Keywords: Network governance, migration profile, government, non-governmental organization. 

 


Saqer Suliman, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Governance Science and Public Administration, National University of Public Service, Hungary. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

The international humanities studies strives towards honest, advanced and scientific communication. Therefore, IHS focuses on valid and reliable reported data, results, methods and procedures.

In order to achieve the aforementioned, IHS avoids bias in experimental design, data analysis, data interpretation, peer review, grant writing, expert testimony, and other aspects of research where objectivity is a requirement.

When conducting research on human subjects, IHS believes in minimizing human harm and risks. Finally, IHS believes in respecting human dignity, privacy and autonomy.